The Role of Syntax in Language
This section is an introduction to
syntax in language as far as it is relevant to the content of this book. It is
not meant to be a rigorous discussion of linguistics. What I am describing is a
simple orthodox view of the grammar of language. Some more complex models are
discussed by linguists but these are beyond the scope of this description. This
section is included for those readers who would like a brief overview without
having to refer separately to a linguistics textbook. Those who would like to
read more about the various linguistic theories should refer to the
bibliography for references to linguistics books and to sites on the web
covering linguistic topics.
Languages have rules. The rules of a
language are called the grammar. The reason for these rules is that a person
needs to be able to speak an indeterminately large number of sentences in a
lifetime. The effort would be impossibly great if each sentence had to be
learnt separately.
By learning the rules for connecting
words it is possible to create an infinite number of sentences, all of which
are meaningful to a person who knows the syntax. Thus it is possible to
construct many sentences that the speaker has never heard before.
A finite number of rules facilitates an
infinite number of sentences that can be simultaneously understood by both the
speaker and the listener.
In order for this to work with any
degree of success, the rules have to be precise and have to be consistently
adhered to. These rules cover such things as: the way words are constructed;
the way the endings of words are changed according to context (inflection); the
classification of words into parts of speech (nouns, verbs, pronouns, etc.);
the way parts of speech are connected together.
The rules of grammar do not have to be
explicitly understood by the speaker of the language or the listener.
The majority of native speakers of a
language will have no formal knowledge of the grammar of a language but are
still capable of speaking the language grammatically to a great degree of
accuracy. Native speakers of a language assimilate these rules subconsciously
while the language is being learned as a child.
The Components
of Grammars
The grammar of a
language has several components. These can be described as follows:
a) The phonetics
that governs the structure of sounds;
b) The
morphology that governs the structure of words;
c) The syntax,
which governs the structure of sentences
d) The semantics
that governs the meanings of words and sentences.
We are concerned
here primarily with the syntax of the structure of sentences.
The
Representations of Syntax
In Linguistics,
the syntax of sentences can be described by different methods, for instance,
for the following sentence:
"The boy
kicked the ball"
The syntax can
be described, by the following methods:
1. A statement
of the correct sequence of the parts of speech (or Syntactic Categories):
Subject is
followed by verb is followed by object.
In the above
example,
subject =
"The boy" (article followed by noun)
verb =
"kicked"
object =
"The ball" (article followed by noun)
2. by a series
of transformational rules
For example: 

Where in the above example,

3. By parsing diagrams
Here, the parts of a sentence are shown
in a graphical way that emphasises the hierarchical relationships between the
components of a sentence. For example:

Where:
Subject = “the boy” (article + noun)
Verb = “kicked”
Object = “the ball” (article + noun)
The above structure is the basic
syntactic structure for a sentence in the English language. As more complex
sentences are considered, it is easy, by this method, to see how these
different structures relate to each other, by further breaking down the
branches of the structure. The syntax of the language contains the rules which
govern the structure of phrases and how these can be joined together. The
structures and associated rules vary from one language to another.
Parsing diagrams are capable of
representing not just one particular language’s grammar but are capable of representing
any kind of grammar. For instance, they can be used to represent the rules of
invented languages such as computer programming languages.
This method of representation is the one
that I will use to represent musical structures because of the graphic nature
of the representation and the flexibility of the approach. By this method, we
can show the types of syntactic structures in music and show how they relate to
each other by expending or contracting branches of the structure.
Examples of More Complex Syntactic
Structures in language
1. Embedding
It is possible to construct sentences
which are more complex than the example above. This is done by embedding
further phrases within the basic structure. For example, in the sentence:

"The boy with red shorts kicked the
ball."
"with red shorts" is a
prepositional phrase that further describes “the boy” .
This can be represented, within the
basic sentence structure, as follows:
Here we can see how the Prepositional Phrase (PP)
“with red shorts” is embedded within the subject Noun Phrase (NP) so that the
subject is subdivided into a Noun Phrase and Prepositional Phrase (PP). The
Prepositional Phrase itself contains a further Noun Phrase. The parsing diagram
clearly shows the hierarchical relationship between the sentence and its
components. There are many other ways of extending this structure by embedding
subordinate phrases at different parts of the basic structure.
2. Conjoining.
It is also possible to extend sentences by joining
together complete structures or complete and incomplete structures, for
example:
"The boy with red shorts kicked the ball and
scored a goal"
The conjunction “and” joins together the complete
sentence:
"The boy with red shorts kicked the ball"
and the verb phrase:
“scored a goal
This could be represented as follows:
We will see later that in music there is
also one basic structure that can be extended by embedding and conjoining in
similar ways.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar